October 11, 2007

LAWYERS TEST For National Security Part Three


From the Wall Street Journal (Subscription required):

Egad. Call in the attorneys? Perhaps it is Mr. Romney’s experience in business that taught him to want lawyers at his elbow, given that no CEO can survive without them these days. Or perhaps it is our hyper-legalized politics, with Mr. Bush accused daily of “breaking the law” over mere policy disagreements. But deferring to lawyers to tell a President when he can and cannot use force to defend the country is not the proper understanding of executive power under the Constitution, and it is dangerous if it is the first instinct of a Commander in Chief.

Mr. Romney should have said that a President’s first duty is to do whatever it takes to protect the United States, and that he’d have the Constitutional authority to use military force to do so — as Presidents from Washington to Teddy Roosevelt to Reagan have done — but that of course he would want to consult with Congress and win its support as time and circumstances allowed. Mr. Romney doesn’t need a lawyer; he needs to reread the Federalist Papers.

In other words, America needs a LEADER like Rudy Giuliani as President and not an indecisive -BRING IN THE LAWYERS TYPE CEO type like Mitt Romney.

America’s choice but Flap will take the LEADER any day.

Previous:

Mitt Romney Watch:LAWYERS TEST For National Security Part Two

Rudy Giuliani Strikes at Romney Consult the Attorneys GAFFE

Rudy Giuliani Watch: Rudy and Mitt Duke It Out On Taxes

Hillary Health Care 2.0 Similar to Romney’s Health Care Plan Part Two

Mitt Romney FLIP Watch: Hillary Health Care 2.0 Similar to Romney’s Health Care Plan

The Mitt Romney Posts


Technorati Tags: ,

by @ 8:37 am. Filed under GOP Debates

October 9, 2007

Rudy and Mitt Duke It Out On Taxes

Republican presidential hopefuls former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney and former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani talk to each other after the GOP Presidential candidates debate at Ford Community and Performing Arts Center Tuesday, Oct. 9, 2007, in Dearborn, Mich.

Romney, Giuliani Spar on Taxes, Spending

Republican presidential hopefuls Mitt Romney and Rudy Giuliani quarreled over tax and spending cuts Tuesday, each claiming greater commitment than the other in a debate in the nation’s struggling manufacturing heartland.

The government “is spending money of future generations and those yet to be born,” added Fred Thompson, making his debut on a debate stage after a late entry into the race. He said future retirees should receive smaller Social Security benefits than they have been promised.

Well, Fred Thompson lost many Baby Boom Generation voters with this BIG revelation. Voters of Flap’s generation have always been skeptical of whether they would ever get ANY of the money that for years they have been paying into the Social Security system.

In the meantime, Rudy and Mitt DUKE IT OUT with a TIT for TAT that shows Romney’s desperation and means nothing for Rudy.

Americans know that Rudy cleaned up New York City and was a LEADER on 9/11.

So, does this heated discourse on taxes matter?

“I cut taxes 23 times. I believe in tax cuts,” said Giuliani, former mayor of New York and leader in national Republican polls.

Romney initially conceded that, but quickly criticized his rival for once filing a court challenge to a law that gave President Clinton the right to veto spending items line by line. “I’m in favor of the line-item veto,” he said, adding he exercised it 844 times while governor of Massachusetts.
Romney also said that while mayor, Giuliani “fought to keep the commuter tax, which is a very substantial tax … on consumers coming into New York.”

The former governor leads his rivals in the polls in Iowa, where caucuses will be the first contest of the campaign, and he and Giuliani are in a close race in surveys in New Hampshire, the leadoff primary state.

Giuliani responded that spending fell in New York while he was mayor, and rose in Massachusetts while Romney was governor.

“The point is that you’ve got to control taxes. I did it, he didn’t. … I led, he lagged.”

“It’s baloney,” retorted Romney. “I did not increase taxes in Massachusetts. I lowered taxes.”

The exchange was among the most heated of the campaign for the Republican presidential nomination, reflecting a quickening pace as the 2008 caucuses and primaries draw close.

It also left Thompson, Sen. John McCain of Arizona and the other contenders as something of bystanders for the several moments that Romney and Giuliani went at one another.

Not one iota. Rudy shrugged off Romney’s attacks and looked the better for the exchange.

Here is Rudy being interviewed after the GOP debate by Larry Kudlow:

Stay tuned…….

Previous:

Rudy Giuliani Confirmed for Values Voter Summit

Rudy Giuliani Watch: Southwest Florida Today

Rudy Giuliani Watch: Rudy at Americans for Prosperity Foundation

Rudy Giuliani on the Rush Limbaugh Phony Soldier Attack

Rudy Giuliani Leads in 3Q GOP Presidential Fundraising

Rudy Giuliani Watch: Is a Clinton Presidency Inevitable Like 1992?

Rudy Giuliani Watch: Rudy Assails Hillary Clinton for Southern Accent Pander

Giuliani Poll Watch: New Hampshire - Rudy Gains as Romney Declines

Mitt Romney Lead in New Hampshire Collapses


Technorati Tags:

by @ 10:36 pm. Filed under GOP Debates

June 6, 2007

Giuliani Notes: NH GOP Debate - Rudy Wins

Cross Posted from the FullosseousFlap’s Dental Blog


Rich Lowry @ National Review: Rudy Wins

If any pro-choicer can win the Republican presidential nomination, it’s Rudy Giuliani. His abortion answer was bad, but what people will remember is his joking around about getting struck down by lightening during it. Otherwise, he was quick, commanding, authoritative-sounding—altogether the Big Man on stage, projecting the image of the kind of guy you can trust during a time of war. He kept taking digs at Washington, burnishing his outsider credentials, and was frank and feisty in taking it to the enemy both metaphorical (the Dems, the media) and real (Islamic terrorism). For all the invocations of Reagan during these forums, Rudy’s strength and emphasis on freedom is probably what is going to strike most voters as really Reaganesque. (All this said, I wish he cared to try to reach an accommodation with pro-lifers that would make his candidacy even stronger).

Agreed.

Hizzoner had a “COMMANDING PRESENCE” in tonight’s debate. He was extremely Presidential and someone you can trust in a time of war.

Rudy was RIGHT on the issues from the Scooter Libby sentencing debacle to calling the Democrats out on “socialized medicine.”

So, what are others saying?

New York Sun’s Ryan Sager: “Big Giuliani Win.”

National Review’s Kathryn Jean Lopez: “Rudy Won.”

National Review’s Kate O’Beirne: “Rudy Finishes Strong.”

NBC News’ Chuck Todd: “Rudy Giuliani was solid …”

Power Line Blog’s John Hinderaker: “Rudy Giuliani … broke away from the pack tonight …”

CBN’s David Brody: “On immigration, it’s a very complicated issue but Giuliani was able to boil it down to basically say ‘throw the bad people out’ and then was able to weave his idea for national ID cards into the answer.”

Captains Quarters: Post Debate Analysis: Giuliani Keeps The Crown For Now

Giuliani performed the best. He took advantage of a recurring technical glitch to demonstrate his sense of humor, and he gave great answers on national-security questions. He attacked Hillary Clinton — again — and was the only one on stage looking to move the debate to the Democrats — again. He stung CNN, too, by turning around a Blitzer hypothetical about what he’d do if Petraeus reported no progress in September by asking Blitzer whether he’d bother reporting progress if it was being made.

Update:

Hugh Hewitt: Giuliani “Looked And Sounded Great Tonight” And Would Be A “Formidable” Candidate

National Review’s Jim Geraghty: “Rudy … has been en fuego, as they say on Sportscenter.”

Townhall’s Mary Katharine Ham: “From his first answer on Iraq, in which he notably outdid Romney who answered the same question right before him, Rudy seemed on point tonight.”

National Review’s Michael Graham: “Rudy does it in one sentence: ‘It’s unimaginable that you’d leave Saddam in power while fighting a war on terror.’ That’s the argument the GOP should embrace, seize and use …”

Previous:

The Rudy Giuliani Files


Technorati Tags:

by @ 8:50 am. Filed under GOP Debates

Blogroll

Official Site

JoinRudy2008

Main

Meta Data



Design By